Thanks for the clarification on the mapping difference. That makes much
more sense to me now, also that the TPS is a minor tweak in the whole
mixture equation. It'll be interesting to see where mine is set. Like I
said before, mine's not bad at all, only in low rpm range usually in
real slow traffic or a parking lot, somewhere around ~2k rpm, probably
not worth messing with. I'm also not surprised about some having success
with a particular TPS setting and others not. I'm sure it all depends on
a multitude of settings. Bob B.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TPS and FI relationship


The 94 US models had a richer DECEL mapping than the 93 US model did.
Adjusting the TPS helps by richening the mixture as much as it can,
there are
still other sensors controlling mixture that factor in to the final
output. I
also believe some people are more sensitive to the surge than others. I
truly
believe anyone that is bothered by the surge on their bike could get on
any
other gts and detect the same problem.
RSRBOB

Reply via email to