Yeh Bob, but really only in name. Just all about marketing really. There was no way they'd call it a GTS considering it was a marketing flop. But for all intents and purposes the new FJR is closer to the GTS than the old FJ...
Seeing as the weight of the FJR is about 620 lbs (according to latest US mags) it's going to be interesting to see how the ST1300 turns out. It's supposed to be the same weight (we'll see I guess) and while it'll almost certainly be somewhat slower and more expensive than the FJR it could be the pick of the big sport-tourers. Joe. -----Original Message----- From: Burton, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GTS vs. FJR1300 It's a replacement for the FJ not for the GTS..... ======================================================================================NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ==============================================================================
