Andreas Enge (2015-12-04 20:13 +0300) wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:08:36PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >> I cry every time I see samba during updating my profile, so I wonder if >> it is acceptable to have "mpv-minimal" which is less heavy on >> dependencies. If so, perhaps the other people have ideas what inputs >> may also be removed, thanks. > > Or would it make sense to remove samba altogether from the regular mpv > package?
I'm personally for it, but there may be users who need mpv with samba support, so I'm not sure if it is right. I thought that default Guix packages should be full-featured, no? -- Alex
