On Sat, 05 Dec 2015 21:49:53 +0300 Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andreas Enge (2015-12-04 20:13 +0300) wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:08:36PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > >> I cry every time I see samba during updating my profile, so I wonder if > >> it is acceptable to have "mpv-minimal" which is less heavy on > >> dependencies. If so, perhaps the other people have ideas what inputs > >> may also be removed, thanks. > > > > Or would it make sense to remove samba altogether from the regular mpv > > package? > > I'm personally for it, but there may be users who need mpv with samba > support, so I'm not sure if it is right. I thought that default Guix > packages should be full-featured, no? > we could rename the current one mpv-network-support or something similar. -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
pgpFicYZsMm1n.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
