On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:35:45 +0300 > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote: > One build and two outputs, mpv and mpv-minimal, would be nice for a > substitution server but not be too helpful in the case of building your own > packages. I don't believe it would be possible. > > off the top of my head for defining mpv-minimal in terms of mpv (see > python.scm for a lot more examples): > > (define-public mpv-minimal > (package (inherit mpv) > (name "mpv-minimal) > (inputs (alist-delete "samba" (package-inputs mpv))))) >
I think Alex and Efraim are right, based on my very limited understanding of multi-output packages. Since I don't use mpv or samba, I don't have a stake in this. Feel free to do whatever you decide. > -- > Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
