On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > I'm personally for it, but there may be users who need mpv with samba > > support, so I'm not sure if it is right. I thought that default Guix > > packages should be full-featured, no?
No idea. I am not sure we need windows support :-) (or whatever this is exactly). If nobody needs it and some feel disturbed, we may as well remove it for the time being and think again once someone requests it. > we could rename the current one mpv-network-support or something similar. Rather not; the default package should have the default name. Andreas
