ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: >> Is adding “bluez” and “libogg” really needed? They seem a little >> unusual for networking software. > > It is not just networking software. > It's been to long since I found out all these dependencies, I just > decided to add them to guix master now. Bluez is for bluetooth support > of whatever feature (look it up in either documentation or the > Makefile), libogg is needed for audio playback I think. I could be wrong > about this one. You know, the longer you work on something the more you > find and without comments it all gets obscure. But I really think libogg > in addition to libopus is for something audio related.
Well, that’s why I’m asking as I don’t have time to investigate the reasons for the suggested changes myself. I know what “bluez” and “libogg” do, but it’s a bit odd to have them as dependencies of GNUnet. GNUnet doesn’t encode/decode ogg audio files, does it? > If you think comments are needed because someone in the future could > decide to cut down the "bloat", I can comment all the dependencies with > which part of GNUnet needs them. Commenting unusual inputs should be enough. ~~ Ricardo
