Hartmut Goebel <h.goe...@goebel-consult.de> writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> Am 19.09.2016 um 17:21 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>> Ah, thanks. This makes sense. I wonder if it were possible to split
>> the applications. Not now but in the future. Would be nice to be able
>> install these things separately.
>
> I'm afraid this would require larger changes to gnunet - which I do not
> expect to happen anytime soon. They even added an option `--with-taler`
> (AFAIR) to compile only the parts relevant for the taler payment. This
> sound like gnunet being a huge pile of software which is hard to split. :-(
I don't know about taler-payment. I just package merchant and that other
part which requires building, the rest does not need packaging.
About a huge piece of software, I don't see this. I see modules, and at
the rootlevel svn it has many individual pieces, one of them being
gnunet. I have no access to the roadmap, but I can ask for a further
splitup / makefile options to be added. Makefiles are not so much my
domain and I wiuld like to add this, but I focus on other things.
--
ng0
