Hi Chris and Ludo,
Thanks Chris for the explanation. At some point, I had write access on
the GCD repo. Hum, probably when still hosted on Savannah, I guess.
> Can you make a pull request for now?
Already done. :-)
https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/6
People with power, feel free to also close PR#11 already integrated in
#6. To clear, the current PR#6 now contains:
+ The initial patch of PR#6 (5 commits)
+ All PR#11 except the reword of one commit message for better matching
the other GCDs. (45 commits + 1 reworded)
+ A commit on the top of PR#11 that adjusts the header (1 commit)
Total: 52 commits.
> Then I agree with Chris that we need to figure out a better
> organization, either with a dedicated team with write access to this
> repo, or adding committers on a case-by-case basis for authors (I
> thought that was already the case).
If it’s a team, then this very team must be the timekeeper instead of
the sponsors. Else, if it’s a case-by-case addition, I’d propose that
instead of authors, it should the sponsors (therefore still the
timekeepesr as it should be done when following current GCD 001).
Well, indeed something to rehash in order to find better organisation. :-)
Cheers,
simon
