Hello, Am Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 03:27:13PM +0900 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > I'm also firmly of the opinion that introducing > expectations/policy/rules bound to divide our community or taint our > view of some of its members is not a good thing, especially since genAI > has been with us for a couple years already and we so far haven't seen > serious practical issues with it (such as being buried under a mountain > of genIA slop review requests).
I do not share the analysis that policy divides the community; division is already there and can be seen in the discussion, it is simply made visible by the fact that we now have a discussion instead of just not talking about it. So attempting to reach a consensus is the exact opposite, it has the goal of bridging the divide and reaching a state with which everyone can live and continue to contribute. GenAI has been around, but is becoming ever more prevalent, so now is a good time to take decisions, before we are buried under a mountain of slop. And we have seen the first problems appear in our community: People using agents to interact with Codeberg, LLM use to prepare pull requests, some people committing the results, others stating we should not do this. Sloppy translations were mentioned. In an absence of policy, everything is allowed, and we see the first conflicts emerging. Have a nice trip! Andreas
