On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 10:44 AM pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hi Florian, > > > > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <[email protected]> skribis: > > > >> My impression is that all GCD 008 versions are quite strict on the use > >> of all generative AI, despite some exceptions in the latest proposed > >> policy versions that Maxim criticized. I seek ambiguity in legal > >> significance more than there really is in the policy. > >> > >> Ambiguity stems from the difference of commitments and of policy to what > >> has been accepted by me and Julien Lepiller for translations so far. > > > > [...] > > > >> A strict policy looks nice if we don’t want this meandering quality, but > >> then Weblate is not sustainable without gating access. > > > > OK, thanks for explaining. > > > > Since translation is quite special (in that people submit individual > > strings rather than big chunks), > > Yes, there is no legal concern.
The Legally Significant [0] page in the GNU Maintainer documentation linked from GCD 008 expresses a legal consideration: "Keep in mind, however, that a series of minor changes by the same person can add up to a significant contribution. What counts is the total contribution of the person; it is irrelevant which parts of it were contributed when." [0] https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html
