Greg Hogan <[email protected]> writes:
Our project has never distinguished or placed one person above
or
below another. There are additional hats ("responsibilities")
which
may be worn as a committer, maintainer, team member but we all
equally
participate in contributions, reviews, mailing list discussions,
etc.
"Commit access should not be thought of as a “badge of honor”
but
rather as a responsibility a contributor is willing to take to
help
the project." [0]
Only commitments #2 and #3 follow as project
commitments. Commitment
#1 is covered by the policy for contributions and could be
removed.
Then there is no need to reword or clarify the policy for
contributions.
Jason, Ludo', WDYT?
[0]
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/1.5.0/en/html_node/Commit-Access.html
Unless I'm misunderstanding, it sounds like you're proposing that
that project members *should* be allowed to use LLMs for
contributions. I thought that the doc's intent was rather
different, but perhaps Ludo' can clarify.
Jason
