On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 2:06 PM Jason Conroy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greg Hogan <[email protected]> writes: > > Our project has never distinguished or placed one person above > > or > > below another. There are additional hats ("responsibilities") > > which > > may be worn as a committer, maintainer, team member but we all > > equally > > participate in contributions, reviews, mailing list discussions, > > etc. > > > > "Commit access should not be thought of as a “badge of honor” > > but > > rather as a responsibility a contributor is willing to take to > > help > > the project." [0] > > > > Only commitments #2 and #3 follow as project > > commitments. Commitment > > #1 is covered by the policy for contributions and could be > > removed. > > Then there is no need to reword or clarify the policy for > > contributions. > > > > Jason, Ludo', WDYT? > > > > [0] > > https://guix.gnu.org/manual/1.5.0/en/html_node/Commit-Access.html > > Unless I'm misunderstanding, it sounds like you're proposing that > that project members *should* be allowed to use LLMs for > contributions. I thought that the doc's intent was rather > different, but perhaps Ludo' can clarify.
Ludo' previously stated 'In my mind “contributors” in the policy is any contributor, including “project members”' [0] and my request is simply to clarify this in the consensus document so that there is no confusion when harmonizing the new GCD into the existing project documentation. [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-06/msg00218.html
