Gabriel Wicki <[email protected]> writes: > Why would we suddenly opt for non-ideal "solutions" when (as I perceive) > most people are not completely satisfied with the outcome?
To answer your likely rethorical question: because the issues that people have with this non-ideal solution are diametrically opposed to each other. One might have preferred a more strict GCD008, another a more lax GCD008, thus there is no solution that is "ideal" to both of them. This, to me, seems like you are in fundamental disagreement with the GCD process itself, since (to me) the goal of said process is almost always to find outcomes which "most people are not completely satisfied with" but which most people prefer over the current situation and which everyone can live with. You seem to be opposed to compromise, whereas (to my mind) compromise is the explicit goal of the process - every once in a blue moon it might in theory happen that the document is "ideal" for (nearly) everyone, but that is unrealistic if the document deals with a subject as contentious as LLM use Kind regards, pinoaffe
