Hi everyone, I was about to write against closing the pull request of this GCD, but since I noticed that an LLM agent was an author, I discarded it, because I doubt that the copyright claim and the licensing of this GCD is anymore valid.
Even before GCD 008 was proposed, I would not have used LLM for my contribution due to a risk of the lack of my honest copyright claim. To be honest, this new GCD 009 looks good to me. If this has used LLM only as a tool to improve the human author's code I would have been ready to support it, but now I don't since it is one of the authors who wrote it (please correct me if I am wrong). Regards, Sughosha
