Greg Hogan <[email protected]> writes: > GCD 009 has not been withdrawn and the author has requested a sponsor > [1] during active (early, pre-discussion) good faith discussion so > > I sponsor > > in good faith as well. GCD 008 established (with near consensus, and > in common with the pending GNU guidelines per RMS) that LLM > contributions are acceptable to our project, with constraints, and I > believe that the author and community can likewise work to build > consensus around this proposal. Also from GCD 001:
the gcd was not made in good faith as a serious proposal, but as a criticism of the process we just went through. that has been made explicit[1][2]. upping the ante like this feels like abuse of the gcd process to me, and i don't see how continuing like this is going to help bring the temperature back down. we're all in this together, and for the most part, we're all really good at understanding that and acting that way, in spite of disagreements. can we please just close this pr? the point has been made, and it's acting as a locus of contention and divisiveness, and i don't see how it can be anything else. -bjc -- [1] https://yhetil.org/guix-devel/CAJ=Rwfb54FFkpMBEXwPJTPh37wztqsd=jcianizewbnpxgh...@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://yhetil.org/guix-devel/[email protected]/
