Hi Marius, On Mon, Oct 05 2026, Marius Bakke wrote:
> You could have said that Guix can not accept something that's partly > generated, and it would be _fine_, I can work with that. That is, however, what Ludovic wrote. Please look again: > It wasn’t hard to guess that using an LLM to produce a fair share of > this project was going to be met with pushback in this community [...] > So, instead of tying us together, it’s creating friction. So the question is, can you live with it or can you not? I think you are feeling sad because your contribution is not being valued (that also happened to me) but it's not right to accuse Ludovic of a shallow dismissal when Ludovic provided the reasoning that you wrote would be acceptable to you. To leave this message on a positive note, I'll mention that have been writing my udev rules in GNU Guile for some time. [1] I am hopeful to do, one day, with Eudev what I did with Linux-PAM. [2] Would you be available to provide your thoughts when the time comes? Kind regards Felix [1] Implements eudev's builtin ID_NET_NAME_MAC, which doesn't work in Guix, https://codeberg.org/lechner/system-config/src/commit/b8199a50eb2a4b992e43ac432fa9474f09d106d6/service/udev-rules-net-name-mac.scm#L20 [2] https://juix.org/manuals/guile-pam.html
