October 5, 2026 at 9:08 AM, "Marius Bakke" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]?to=%22Marius%20Bakke%22%20%3Cmarius.andre.bakke%40gmail.com%3E > wrote:
> > Hi Ludovic, all > > > > > To me Goodev in its current form is a dead end > > > I must say I'm rather disappointed by such a shallow dismissal. Is the > current form without hwdb and builtins a "dead end"? > > You could have said that Guix can not accept something that's partly > generated, and it would be _fine_, I can work with that. > > But when you, the Guix founder, declares it dead in the water that does > not give much room for recourse. Obviously no one is going to touch it. > > That said... > > I would also like to apologise for barging in with a controversial > project when tensions are this high. I should have humbly asked for > help to replace the problematic bits instead of trying to impose a > partially generated program on Guix users. An apology is necessary! Jesus never preached about the evil's of LLMs... Thanks for giving the community another udev option! And your decision to remove the LLM generated code certainly should make your project acceptable to guix. Though it sounds like someone needs to write some more code for goodev before it is merged into guix... I personally am ok with using LLMs to write code, even though most others are not. :) Joshua
