Hi Noé, Noé Lopez <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sat, 2026-10-03 at 05:42 -0700, Marius Bakke wrote: >> "mr.doojin" <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > I don't like the idea of merging a vibe-coded component in guix >> > core. >> >> What gives you the impression that goodev is vibe-coded? >> >> > Replacing eudev with udev shouldn't be difficult for guix >> > maintainers. I prefer udev to goodev if goodev is vibe-coded. >> >> systemd allows LLM-assisted commits, and these changes trickle down >> to >> eudev, so it's not much better. At least goodev is written in a >> language we all know and love! :-) > > Hi, > > I’m concerned that replacing components just because we prefer the > language is not a good reason. It's part a long tradition in Guix to implement as much of the system in Guile, where it makes sense to. It looks like there are at least some other technical reasons that would also make goodev interesting, from what Marius mentioned in another reply. Assuming udev is not a fast-moving target anymore, the ongoing maintenance of goodev could be low enough to be sustainable. Anyway, what I mostly wanted to say was, cool project, Marius! :-). Happy hacking. -- Thanks, Maxim
