Or maybe simply put: " ... charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software that promotes stronger integration between the various codebases and between the codebase and the communities that maintain it. "
Of this last version I like the fact that it emphasises the "integration" part (and in fact brings us back to the simpler but undefined "continuous integration").
I believe that nightlies are also now part of it, as in the "between the codebase and the communities" part.
I like it, but the board might not since it's a little too general. the "creation of artifacts" defined the scope, but still keeping it big enough.
Don't know, either way I'm cool with it. What do others think?
I think "creation of artifacts" or something to limit scope is needed.
The point being gump is not a BUILD engine, like ant or maven. gump is a way to cordinate many builds.
perhaps creation and cross pollination of artifacts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
