Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ...
in short, I would say it as
... charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to automatic project artifact creation in order to promote stronger integration between the various codebases and between the codebase and the communities that maintain it.
Nice. But Gump also makes stats and someone proposed javadocs (ala defunct alexandria).
Would that count as "artifact", should we scrap the idea, or should we say something like "related to automatic project artifact and documentation creation"?
Or maybe simply put: " ... charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software that promotes stronger integration between the various codebases and between the codebase and the communities that maintain it. "
Of this last version I like the fact that it emphasises the "integration" part (and in fact brings us back to the simpler but undefined "continuous integration").
I believe that nightlies are also now part of it, as in the "between the codebase and the communities" part.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
