On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Onno Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jon replied to David:
>> How about some sort of competitive (or cooperative) obstacle course?
>> Or a three-dimensional counterpart to ice skating, or an airborne
>> counterpart to synchronized swimming.
>
> * I wonder if there could be a cross between 'synchronized
>  swimming', ballet and trapeze performances. The team tries
>  to fly neat patterns, but only certain members are allowed
>  to touch the walls (or poles, etc), the others must shove
>  themselves off from their team partners.

That could be interesting.  And if you want to, you could make a ball
game out of it by adding a ball and a pair of goals, and shifting the
focus from the aesthetics to getting the ball into the goal.

> * Could there be actual 'swimming' in air-filled zero-G, i.e.
>  flying by body movement, without the aid of wings? Water is
>  much denser than air, so this would require lots of stamina
>  for comparatively little distance -- an option for smaller
>  ships or stations?

Or with the aid of wings.  The OP talked about muscle-powered sports;
that doesn't mean that the sports can't have gear; just that whatever
gear they have needs to be muscle-powered.  So no "spray can
propulsion", fun as that may be; but aerial fins that amplify the
force that you could generate by flapping your arms?  Why not?

>  Or could you put games into a zero-G water tank?

Not much difference between that and ordinary underwater sports.  As
such, I was thinking primarily in terms of air-filled freefall
environments.  (I was also discounting vacuum environments, because I
can't think of anything you could do in a vacuum that you couldn't do
as well or better in an air-filled chamber.)

-- 
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l

Reply via email to