I'm tempted to write a place marker feature for window-eyes using the scripting capability. I have not ever seen the code nor how it works from either side. I wonder if FS would sue me? I'll call it freedom markers! Oh my, would I be infringing upon 2 different things? Oh my... What a dilemma!!!
Take care. Juan -----Original Message----- From: mop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 1:28 PM To: Alan R. Downing Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: pending lawsuit Lawyers always want controll whether it benefits the client or not. I don't agree that the attorneys would go balistic beause the statements on the list are not from the plaintiffs or defendants. You are comparing the participants statements to those of non-participants. Do you thnk that the antitrust action against microsoft wasn't talked about or the mcdonald's hot coffee suit. Of course they were by the public and that is what is going on here. If gwmicro were making these statements or jaws then you would be correct. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan R. Downing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Grimwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 5:25 AM Subject: Re: pending lawsuit > > Guys, > > Has anyone given consideration to the possibility that all of this public > hand wringing and strategizing might not be wise? > > I have been involved in/with a number of suits over the years, including a > major one against Honeywell, and I can state with certainty that my legal > team would have gone ballistic if they saw something like this. Lawyers > always want to be in control over the publicity surrounding the case; > maybe the lawyers won't have a problem with all of this, but maybe they > will. The point is, list members aren't in a position to make that call. > > As just one example of the control that attorneys like to impose is this. > When my Honeywell case finally got to trial after 2 years of discovery, > they wouldn't even permit my then fiance, or even my mother, to attend > court for the 7 weeks that the trial lasted. Not one day, not even when > the jury returned a verdict in my favor. > > Anyhow, I earnestly believe that a bit of caution as it regards public > statement might well be in order. > > Just my 2 cents. > > > ARD > > If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original > sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and > your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending > your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. > > All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and > can be searched through and sorted using the search > form at the bottom of the page. > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message. > If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search form at the bottom of the page. If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search form at the bottom of the page. If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.
