This will always be true unless Microsoft and Apple developed a built in screen reader that will be as good as a third party screen reader. In this case the cost of development is spread out to a much large number of sales. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Huber" <[email protected]> To: "gw-info" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:38 AM Subject: Re: GW Micro Responds to the Future of Screen Readers Discussion Panel Questions
Hi Pat: I don't think that this is about people wanting a free lunch, it is the fact that if a sighted person and a blind person wanted to buy exactly the same pc, the blind person would have to pay more to be able to make use of it because he/she would have to buy a screen reader. That's what upsets some people. Kevin Huber On 9/2/10, Pat Ferguson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Okay, I have to put in my two cents worth, even though it isn't worth > much. I'm sorry, folks, but GW Micro made the great Loving > Window-Eyes. Why are you so insistant that everything be free? I > mean, let's face it, nothing in this world is free. Don't you think > that GW Micro has a right to charge for Window-Eyes? Don't you know > and respect the fact that they are the only ones, besides Serotec who > has a payment plan! Isn't that loving? I think so! Some people expect > everything for nothing. What's wrong with those of you. I realize > there are people on low income, I've been there, and we're not rich > or even wealthy, and neither is GW Micro. They are rich in being a > loving company with a loving product, but they aren't financially > rich. Give them a break, please...Please, put yourselves in their > shoes...People need jobs today...Our president isn't doing any > justice to our country...Sorry, but I feel that way...Now, let's get > off the pitty party, and be thankful that we have the loving > Window-Eyes...That's all I better say for now. > > Oh, and I must add that other screen readers that are free, are not > any better than Window-Eyes. If you had a free screen reader! Who > would support it? > Pat Ferguson > At 05:01 PM 9/1/2010, you wrote: >>"GW Micro believes that having a free screen reader as part of the >>operating system does a disservice to Blind computer users." >> >>I thought this to be a hypocritical viewpoint. Somewhat charlatanistic. >>It is highly prejudicial to exclude low income users, or encourage >>an over priced payment plan like some sort of layaway. The price is >>highly debatable. It's seems to have to many zeroes. >>I think it's a typo, but no one seems to see it. (pun intended) >>The program itself is not even practical, nor signifigantly better >>than the windows narrotor for common use. >> >>Perhaps I should write the Obama administration to see what he >>thinks about GW micros position on affordable pricing of screen >>readers for the blind/disabled. >>If the president tested Window Eyes head to head with "real" >>software for the blind, he would have to "keep it real" and tell you >>exactly as I have. If not then we have a conspiracy on our hands, >>where the blind are being held back on purpose for extra >>profits. Or possibly for backdoor code abilities that rely on >>accessibility to mask their true intent. >>I will not allow exploitation of the blind, in any case. >> >>Window Eyes could be much better within a couple months of work. >>I mean several times better than it is right now. I know this for a >>fact because I am a developer that has done it. I'd crumple WE, and >>throw it in the trash if I were blind. >>GW probably knows it too, but keeps it secret from the users, >>because they just don't want to spend the time required to fully >>wrap their heads arround it. Or they can't, yet still want to enjoy >>the positive cash flow. The price shows the greed, not crafsmanship. >> >> >> >> >> >>If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original >>sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your >>message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your >>message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. >> >>GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You >>can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv. > > If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender > only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is > related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to > [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. > > GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can > manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
