Just curious, when did Dan Brown claim to DaVinci Code was true. I listened to the unabridged audio book and it seemed like an author who took some facts, some legends, a few other theories.... tweeked to taste and shook well to create an interesting *story*.
I couldn't figure out why so many people were trying to prove/debunk it. To me it was like trying to prove/debunk Tarzan or Sherlock Holmes. <costume content> Medieval Clothing and Textiles 2 is awsome, especially "Clothing Themselves in Acres: Apparel and Impoverishment in Medieval and Early Modern England". </costume content> Onaree On 4/24/06, Gail & Scott Finke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, that's not going to happen, especially when people become > millionares by claiming that the preposterous -- which would otherwise be a > fun "alternate history -- is true. Like . . . Dan Brown and "The DaVinci > Code," for instance. A bunch of crap from beginning to end (oops, did I open > a can of worms?) to anyone who knows ANYTHING about history, art, theology, > etc. Again, claim it's fiction and who cares? But claim it's true and -- !!! > > Gail Finke -- Proud List Mom of Irish_Crochet_Lovers http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Irish_Crochet_Lovers/ _______________________________________________ h-costume mailing list [email protected] http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
