Thanks so much--this is really helpful.  I am making a reproduction 1861
dress, but I used green piping instead of self piping, because it picked
up the tiny amount of green in t he small print on a dark blue
background, and was one of the few decorative elements.  I look forward
to meeting you at the Genteel Arts Conference, and perhaps discuss some
of this!

Yours in costuming, Lisa A

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:25:06 -0500 "Lists" <[email protected]>
writes:
> Hi, Lisa - 
> 
> Piping is not an absolute, but it does appear in almost all adult 
> dresses
> c.1860-1865: in the armscyes for stabilization and strength and at 
> the
> waistline and neckline as a finishing technique. The curved back 
> seams are
> usually not piped; what appears to be piping in photographs is 
> topstitching.
> On a significant number of dresses, this curved back seam is not 
> even a seam
> - it's a tuck folded into the fabric.  
> 
> Self-fabric piping is also not an absolute - but the number of 
> extant
> garments with contrasting piping represent a miniscule amount of 
> surviving
> garments - possibly just a fraction of a percent of those worn 
> during the
> period. Examples where I have found contrasting piping: a wrapper
> c.1861-1863 that used scrap fabric as part of the construction. e.g. 
> collar,
> belt, cuffs and piping; two evening gowns c.1865-1866 where 
> significantly
> larger piping was used as a decorative accent; and two children's 
> dresses
> where contrasting fabric was used as a trimming.  In four decades 
> of
> research and hundreds of original garments - those have been the 
> only
> examples I've encountered from this era. Contrasting piping does 
> become more
> common in the post-war era. I've discussed this with other 
> researchers and
> collectors who focus on this era and their surveys are comparable 
> with mine.
> 
> 
> The only absolute in American Civil War era dresses is a dropped 
> armscye;
> there are exceptions to almost every other characteristic. However, 
> contrast
> piping in adult garments appears to be an aberration rather except 
> in the
> circumstances I mentioned. 
> 
> As always, YMMV, and I'd enjoy hearing about other examples that I 
> can add
> to my database. :-)
> 
> Regards,
> Carolann Schmitt
> [email protected]
> www.genteelarts.com
> Ladies & Gentlemen of the 1860s Conference, March 3-6, 2011
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> h-costume mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
> 
> 
 
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to