It was actually good news for compatibility on windows when MSJVM was
ditched in favor of Sun's jvm.
It's better to build one jvm that works the same on all OS's.
I think we java devs should worry more about what Oracle is up to.
But suffice to say that Java is so big that if Oracle would leave it
unused there are other big companies that would
pick up the oppotunity, like IBM (that has contributed considerably to
java technology already).
Sun still exists although the names have changed and let's hope Mac
engineers work together with Sun engineers.
- Rami
On 10.11.2010 14:45, Wildam Martin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 13:47, RICCARD<[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for info. I heared (=rumours) that discussions for a JRE 2.0 started
and is planned for next year.
My source works wit MAC if that could explain anything.
As a Mac user you might be getting a problem in general with Java as of:
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#releasenotes/Java/JavaSnowLeopardUpdate3LeopardUpdate8RN/NewandNoteworthy/NewandNoteworthy.html
Which contains a note that Java is deprecated on Mac.
Developer community is angry about that and there is a petition you can sign:
http://news.java-virtual-machine.net/6236.html
However, my personal opinion is: Apple hasn't yet the market share
that Microsoft does, but (already) behaves similar, so it is to avoid.
I know other developers sucessfully switched from Mac to Linux. I
personally came from Windows world but did the same.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
