On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Sean T Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> > <snip> > > I seem to recall that one of the concerns raised previously was with the > release cycle rules for an incubator project. In light of A) the current > time span between releases as is, and B) the loose consensus that we > didn't handle the 0.6 one as cleanly as we'd like; I think those issues > are minor. I'm willing to +1 opening a general vote, with the > observation that, as this is a major change, I don't feel that 36 hours > is sufficient. I'd like to see at least 72 hours, and preferably a full > week so that everyone involved has time to do a little more research and > raise any final questions. For some people, the work week doesn't offer > sufficient time for this, so spanning a weekend would be favorable in my > opinion. > We've been discussing it on IRC, and there's certainly no reason we couldn't put a final decision on hold while we get any questions we may have answered. If anyone has specific questions, please try and make them into a list so we have a specific set of items to address. Expanding to a week seems to be fine with everyone. It's more important that we get questions and concerns taken care of than that we stick to some specific timeline. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
