Clarification needed: we're looking at the hosting options, and if I understand correctly, a4d is moving but the node concept is stalled and may generate a project that is not focused on one specific candidate or org. Is that correct?
I think we need to clarify the hosting requirements for the nodeless a4d to determine what Polycot can do, can we revisit that? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Joshua Koenig > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:19 PM > To: zachary rosen > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hackers] node hosting > > > > Yes - I am all for it. The only concern is: if there is to strong a > > connection / correlation between the Dean campaign and this non profit > > service then the campaign is liable. > > Two points: > > 1) IMHO this should not be a non-profit venture. This is different from > the idea of an academic project which will further the general goals of > nodal/online politics. It needs to be non-partisan, but it's > essentially a fee-for-service company, and that's all it should be. > It's blogspot for a modified version of drupal. There are also > strategic reasons for this (see my previous email). > > 2) As long as the class and quality of service offered is neutral, then > it doesn't matter who sets it up. The proof is in the pudding, not in > the pedigree. This would mean a stock turnkey install would not include > a partisan drupal theme, but we could offer a theme gallery which users > would be free to contribute to. > > cheers > -josh > >
