I have a HackRF one, and I'm reading up on the Yard Stick One. I'm wondering, if I have the HackRF One, does the HackRF do the same thing as the Yard Stick One? I read that it's based on the CC1101 chip. I have one of the CC1101 modules, so how would having a Yard Stick One benefit me?
I know both are only half duplex so maybe with both you have full duplex. Since I already have various RF transmitters and a CC1101, perhaps a Yard Stick One would not benefit me? The only reason to buy a Yard Stick One that I could think of is so that I can transmit at the same time as I'm receiving on the HackRF. I think I can accomplish this same thing with my CC1101 module? Perhaps there's more tools developed for the Yard Stick One and that's the main benefit? On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:29 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send HackRF-dev mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of HackRF-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. More RF power (Tony Hagen) > 2. Re: More RF power (Marc P?quignot) > 3. Re: <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in Nanoseconds > with HackRf (Andreas Hornig) > 4. Re: More RF power (Cinaed Simson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:31:00 +0530 > From: "Tony Hagen" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power > Message-ID: <2D596BD325DF41289EE7447084825F72@cedalabz> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Hi, > > In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want to > transmit with more RF power. > > If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can build > respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more > > Please let me know your interest on this > > > > 73s > Tony > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:08:46 +0200 > From: Marc P?quignot <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > Hi, > > It will be at the limit. However a Ham HF band may be interesting. > A couple of watts is enough. > > 73s > > F6DNH > > > Le 03/04/2016 12:01, Tony Hagen a ?crit : > > Hi, > > > > In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want > > to transmit with more RF power. > > > > If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can > > build respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more > > > > Please let me know your interest on this > > > > > > > > 73s > > Tony > > > > _______________________________________________ > > HackRF-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 20:51:20 +0200 > From: Andreas Hornig <[email protected]> > To: ERNEST MATEY <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], "[email protected] >> > hackrf-dev" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in > Nanoseconds with HackRf > Message-ID: > < > cafqvuhy42h4wgosjydhqhuotjc0zxmugodrap9vtmaspkyn...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi Ernest, > > may I ask what kind of appraoch you are using? 30 meters acurracy will be > sporty. > > Andreas > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:02 AM, ERNEST MATEY <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > Thank you very much for reply and check of website. > > Precision for Bird Project I aim is 30 meters. > > > > Thank you for your help and suggestions are greatly welcomed for CW > > arrival detection and time measurement. > > > > Best Regards > > Ernest. > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. > > *From: *Andreas Hornig > > *Sent: *Saturday, April 2, 2016 1:16 AM > > *To: *ERNEST MATEY > > *Cc: *[email protected]; [email protected] >> > > hackrf-dev > > *Subject: *Re: [Hackrf-dev] <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in > > Nanoseconds with HackRf > > > > Hi Ernest, > > > > the first question for me is, what kind of precision of orbit > > position/parameters do you want to achieve for your BIRD satellite[0]. > > I might perhaps help, because I am doing the same thing for my PhD > workbut > > not with GnuRadio and HackRF. > > > > And yes, my approach is DSP heavy as others told here already, and I am > > working on this for 3 years now (started as a side project). :D > > > > Andreas > > > > [0] http://birds.ele.kyutech.ac.jp/mrErnest.html > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/hackrf-dev/attachments/20160403/f5f863cf/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 13:21:51 -0700 > From: Cinaed Simson <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > On 04/03/2016 03:01 AM, Tony Hagen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want to > > transmit with more RF power. > > > > If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can build > > respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more > > > > Please let me know your interest on this > > Hmm, at 1 W a VSWR over 1.22:1 may smoke the RF amplifier on the HackRF > - assuming roughly a 10 mW reflection smokes it - and ignoring all the > losses in the system. > > How about low power amplifiers (100-500 mW) - with a maximum RF_IN of at > least 20 dBm? > > How about low power band pass filters - with a maximum RF_IN of at least > 20 dBm for the HackRF, Ubertooth and Yardstick? > > -- Cinaed > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > HackRF-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > > > ------------------------------ > > End of HackRF-dev Digest, Vol 42, Issue 3 > ***************************************** > -- *O.T. Timothy PowellEE Engineering TechM: 386.299.6991 <386.299.6991>[email protected]*
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
