Thank you sir, great response. It helps immensly. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Dominic Spill <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4 April 2016 at 16:54, O.T. Powell <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a HackRF one, and I'm reading up on the Yard Stick One. I'm > > wondering, if I have the HackRF One, does the HackRF do the same thing as > > the Yard Stick One? > > HackRF One can theoretically do everything YARDStick One can do, it is > a matter of writing software to perform the CC11xx modem functions on > the host. There is a gr-cc11xx project, but I have no idea what the > status of it is. > https://github.com/andrepuschmann/gr-cc11xx > > > I read that it's based on the CC1101 chip. I have one > > of the CC1101 modules, so how would having a Yard Stick One benefit me? > > I assume that you mean the evaluation module from TI? The benefit of > YS1 over those is the improved radio section, the evaluation kits use > chip antennas which I believe are designed for one of the bands > supported by the CC11xx. > > However, YS1 has TX/RX amps, an SMA connector, additional filtering > and antenna port power. > > > I know both are only half duplex so maybe with both you have full duplex. > > Since I already have various RF transmitters and a CC1101, perhaps a Yard > > Stick One would not benefit me? > > It really depends on how you intend to use the devices. I know of > some users who have multiple YS1s because they like the RF performance > and simplicity of RFCat; I also believe that the combination of HackRF > One and YS1 is very useful, as shown in Mike's rapid radio reversing > video. > > > The only reason to buy a Yard Stick One that I could think of is so that > I > > can transmit at the same time as I'm receiving on the HackRF. I think I > can > > accomplish this same thing with my CC1101 module? Perhaps there's more > > tools developed for the Yard Stick One and that's the main benefit? > > Assuming that you are using your CC1101 module with RFCat, the > software interface will be the same as YS1. I do not know of any YS1 > specific tools, although I presume that it would be possible for some > to be written in the future (as far as I know we do not plan to write > any YS1-only tools, we prefer to use RFCat as the basis for work with > YS1). > > Thanks, > Dominic > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:29 AM, < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Send HackRF-dev mailing list submissions to > >> [email protected] > >> > >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > >> [email protected] > >> > >> You can reach the person managing the list at > >> [email protected] > >> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >> than "Re: Contents of HackRF-dev digest..." > >> > >> > >> Today's Topics: > >> > >> 1. More RF power (Tony Hagen) > >> 2. Re: More RF power (Marc P?quignot) > >> 3. Re: <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in Nanoseconds > >> with HackRf (Andreas Hornig) > >> 4. Re: More RF power (Cinaed Simson) > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Message: 1 > >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:31:00 +0530 > >> From: "Tony Hagen" <[email protected]> > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power > >> Message-ID: <2D596BD325DF41289EE7447084825F72@cedalabz> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > >> reply-type=original > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want to > >> transmit with more RF power. > >> > >> If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can build > >> respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more > >> > >> Please let me know your interest on this > >> > >> > >> > >> 73s > >> Tony > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 2 > >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:08:46 +0200 > >> From: Marc P?quignot <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power > >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> It will be at the limit. However a Ham HF band may be interesting. > >> A couple of watts is enough. > >> > >> 73s > >> > >> F6DNH > >> > >> > >> Le 03/04/2016 12:01, Tony Hagen a ?crit : > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want > >> > to transmit with more RF power. > >> > > >> > If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can > >> > build respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more > >> > > >> > Please let me know your interest on this > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 73s > >> > Tony > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > HackRF-dev mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 3 > >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 20:51:20 +0200 > >> From: Andreas Hornig <[email protected]> > >> To: ERNEST MATEY <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected], "[email protected] >> > >> hackrf-dev" <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in > >> Nanoseconds with HackRf > >> Message-ID: > >> > >> <cafqvuhy42h4wgosjydhqhuotjc0zxmugodrap9vtmaspkyn...@mail.gmail.com> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >> > >> Hi Ernest, > >> > >> may I ask what kind of appraoch you are using? 30 meters acurracy will > be > >> sporty. > >> > >> Andreas > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:02 AM, ERNEST MATEY <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Andreas, > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for reply and check of website. > >> > Precision for Bird Project I aim is 30 meters. > >> > > >> > Thank you for your help and suggestions are greatly welcomed for CW > >> > arrival detection and time measurement. > >> > > >> > Best Regards > >> > Ernest. > >> > > >> > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. > >> > *From: *Andreas Hornig > >> > *Sent: *Saturday, April 2, 2016 1:16 AM > >> > *To: *ERNEST MATEY > >> > *Cc: *[email protected]; [email protected] >> > >> > hackrf-dev > >> > *Subject: *Re: [Hackrf-dev] <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in > >> > Nanoseconds with HackRf > >> > > >> > Hi Ernest, > >> > > >> > the first question for me is, what kind of precision of orbit > >> > position/parameters do you want to achieve for your BIRD satellite[0]. > >> > I might perhaps help, because I am doing the same thing for my PhD > >> > workbut > >> > not with GnuRadio and HackRF. > >> > > >> > And yes, my approach is DSP heavy as others told here already, and I > am > >> > working on this for 3 years now (started as a side project). :D > >> > > >> > Andreas > >> > > >> > [0] http://birds.ele.kyutech.ac.jp/mrErnest.html > >> > > >> > > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> < > https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/hackrf-dev/attachments/20160403/f5f863cf/attachment-0001.html > > > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 4 > >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 13:21:51 -0700 > >> From: Cinaed Simson <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power > >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > >> > >> On 04/03/2016 03:01 AM, Tony Hagen wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want > to > >> > transmit with more RF power. > >> > > >> > If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can > build > >> > respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more > >> > > >> > Please let me know your interest on this > >> > >> Hmm, at 1 W a VSWR over 1.22:1 may smoke the RF amplifier on the HackRF > >> - assuming roughly a 10 mW reflection smokes it - and ignoring all the > >> losses in the system. > >> > >> How about low power amplifiers (100-500 mW) - with a maximum RF_IN of at > >> least 20 dBm? > >> > >> How about low power band pass filters - with a maximum RF_IN of at least > >> 20 dBm for the HackRF, Ubertooth and Yardstick? > >> > >> -- Cinaed > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Subject: Digest Footer > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> HackRF-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> End of HackRF-dev Digest, Vol 42, Issue 3 > >> ***************************************** > > > > > > > > > > -- > > O.T. Timothy Powell > > EE Engineering Tech > > M: 386.299.6991 > > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > HackRF-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > > > -- *O.T. Timothy PowellEE Engineering TechM: 386.299.6991 <386.299.6991>[email protected]*
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
