I think the most significant benefit of the YARD stick is actually the combination with rfcat. Meaning - the ability to control a radio transceiver interactively using python without having to implement all of the rf chain.
I recommend watching Ossmann's presentation on rapid reverse engineering. I think his demonstration shows the benefits of this stick. Raziel --- How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg > On 4 באפר׳ 2016, at 18:54, O.T. Powell <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a HackRF one, and I'm reading up on the Yard Stick One. I'm > wondering, if I have the HackRF One, does the HackRF do the same thing as the > Yard Stick One? I read that it's based on the CC1101 chip. I have one of > the CC1101 modules, so how would having a Yard Stick One benefit me? > > I know both are only half duplex so maybe with both you have full duplex. > Since I already have various RF transmitters and a CC1101, perhaps a Yard > Stick One would not benefit me? > > The only reason to buy a Yard Stick One that I could think of is so that I > can transmit at the same time as I'm receiving on the HackRF. I think I can > accomplish this same thing with my CC1101 module? Perhaps there's more tools > developed for the Yard Stick One and that's the main benefit? > > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:29 AM, <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Send HackRF-dev mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of HackRF-dev digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. More RF power (Tony Hagen) >> 2. Re: More RF power (Marc P?quignot) >> 3. Re: <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in Nanoseconds >> with HackRf (Andreas Hornig) >> 4. Re: More RF power (Cinaed Simson) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:31:00 +0530 >> From: "Tony Hagen" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power >> Message-ID: <2D596BD325DF41289EE7447084825F72@cedalabz> >> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; >> reply-type=original >> >> Hi, >> >> In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want to >> transmit with more RF power. >> >> If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can build >> respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more >> >> Please let me know your interest on this >> >> >> >> 73s >> Tony >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:08:46 +0200 >> From: Marc P?quignot <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed >> >> Hi, >> >> It will be at the limit. However a Ham HF band may be interesting. >> A couple of watts is enough. >> >> 73s >> >> F6DNH >> >> >> Le 03/04/2016 12:01, Tony Hagen a ?crit : >> > Hi, >> > >> > In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want >> > to transmit with more RF power. >> > >> > If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can >> > build respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more >> > >> > Please let me know your interest on this >> > >> > >> > >> > 73s >> > Tony >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > HackRF-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >> > >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 20:51:20 +0200 >> From: Andreas Hornig <[email protected]> >> To: ERNEST MATEY <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected], "[email protected] >> >> hackrf-dev" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in >> Nanoseconds with HackRf >> Message-ID: >> <cafqvuhy42h4wgosjydhqhuotjc0zxmugodrap9vtmaspkyn...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Hi Ernest, >> >> may I ask what kind of appraoch you are using? 30 meters acurracy will be >> sporty. >> >> Andreas >> >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:02 AM, ERNEST MATEY <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Andreas, >> > >> > Thank you very much for reply and check of website. >> > Precision for Bird Project I aim is 30 meters. >> > >> > Thank you for your help and suggestions are greatly welcomed for CW >> > arrival detection and time measurement. >> > >> > Best Regards >> > Ernest. >> > >> > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. >> > *From: *Andreas Hornig >> > *Sent: *Saturday, April 2, 2016 1:16 AM >> > *To: *ERNEST MATEY >> > *Cc: *[email protected]; [email protected] >> >> > hackrf-dev >> > *Subject: *Re: [Hackrf-dev] <DKIM> Re: TIME OF ARRIVAL OF CW SINGAL in >> > Nanoseconds with HackRf >> > >> > Hi Ernest, >> > >> > the first question for me is, what kind of precision of orbit >> > position/parameters do you want to achieve for your BIRD satellite[0]. >> > I might perhaps help, because I am doing the same thing for my PhD workbut >> > not with GnuRadio and HackRF. >> > >> > And yes, my approach is DSP heavy as others told here already, and I am >> > working on this for 3 years now (started as a side project). :D >> > >> > Andreas >> > >> > [0] http://birds.ele.kyutech.ac.jp/mrErnest.html >> > >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/hackrf-dev/attachments/20160403/f5f863cf/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 13:21:51 -0700 >> From: Cinaed Simson <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] More RF power >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 >> >> On 04/03/2016 03:01 AM, Tony Hagen wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > In the past post I found quite a good amount of the hackrf user want to >> > transmit with more RF power. >> > >> > If you all can discuss your wish list of the band/frequency I can build >> > respective low cost RF amplifier of 1, 2, 5 watts or more >> > >> > Please let me know your interest on this >> >> Hmm, at 1 W a VSWR over 1.22:1 may smoke the RF amplifier on the HackRF >> - assuming roughly a 10 mW reflection smokes it - and ignoring all the >> losses in the system. >> >> How about low power amplifiers (100-500 mW) - with a maximum RF_IN of at >> least 20 dBm? >> >> How about low power band pass filters - with a maximum RF_IN of at least >> 20 dBm for the HackRF, Ubertooth and Yardstick? >> >> -- Cinaed >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HackRF-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of HackRF-dev Digest, Vol 42, Issue 3 >> ***************************************** > > > > -- > O.T. Timothy Powell > EE Engineering Tech > M: 386.299.6991 > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > HackRF-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
