+1 And as Thomas mentioned that sticking to the stable release looks safer for us in maintenance.
On 31 January 2012 11:13, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0. > > And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top > of Hadoop 1.0. > > AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release > just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0. > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Jungblut > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes. >> >> There is >> - 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0. >> - 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0 as well. >> But we have to test this. >> - 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may not run >> on this as well. >> - 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work. >> - 23.0 we have YARN. >> >> We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases. Better >> would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22. >> >> In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release, which >> is *0.20.203. * >> And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases. On the >> common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0. >> >> 2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> >> >>> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps >>> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2) >>> would be a bit easier for us. >>> >>> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different Hadoop versions? >>> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0. >>> > >>> > What should we do with yarn? >>> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people can try it out. >>> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my work is stable. >>> > >>> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>: >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >>> >> >>> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2 and switch the trunk >>> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> >>> > >>> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we use hadoop 1.0.0? and >>> should >>> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > -- >>> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>> >>> > @eddieyoon >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>> >>> @eddieyoon >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thomas Jungblut >>> > Berlin >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Jungblut >> Berlin <[email protected]> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon
