I just noticed that there's a 'allowTimestampedSnapshots' in release-plugin.
But, I prefer delay, it's more stable. What do you think about excluding yarn-version from 0.4.0-incubating release? On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thomas Jungblut <[email protected]> wrote: > You already heard it on commons-dev. There is nothin in the repository. > However, when slicing the release, you could download the real release and > manually put it into the lib folder. > > We can also wait with releasing YARN.. We should look at > HAMA-452<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-452> first, > afterwards we can release it - in my opinion as ALPHA. > > > 2012/2/1 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >> BTW, should we release yarn with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT? >> >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Jungblut >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0. >> >> And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top >> >> of Hadoop 1.0. >> >> AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release >> >> just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0. >> > >> > >> > Yes, this sounds reasonable. >> > >> > 2012/1/31 Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> >> > >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> And as Thomas mentioned that sticking to the stable release looks >> >> safer for us in maintenance. >> >> >> >> On 31 January 2012 11:13, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0. >> >> > >> >> > And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top >> >> > of Hadoop 1.0. >> >> > >> >> > AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release >> >> > just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0. >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Jungblut >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes. >> >> >> >> >> >> There is >> >> >> - 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0. >> >> >> - 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0 as >> >> well. >> >> >> But we have to test this. >> >> >> - 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may not >> >> run >> >> >> on this as well. >> >> >> - 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work. >> >> >> - 23.0 we have YARN. >> >> >> >> >> >> We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases. >> >> Better >> >> >> would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22. >> >> >> >> >> >> In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release, >> >> which >> >> >> is *0.20.203. * >> >> >> And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases. On >> >> the >> >> >> common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >>> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps >> >> >>> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2) >> >> >>> would be a bit easier for us. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut >> >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different Hadoop >> >> versions? >> >> >>> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > What should we do with yarn? >> >> >>> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people can try it >> out. >> >> >>> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my work is >> stable. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>: >> >> >>> >> +1 >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2 and switch the >> >> trunk >> >> >>> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based. >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon < >> >> [email protected]> >> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> > Hi all, >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we use hadoop 1.0.0? >> and >> >> >>> should >> >> >>> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT? >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > -- >> >> >>> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> >> >>> >>> > @eddieyoon >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> -- >> >> >>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> >> >>> >>> @eddieyoon >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > -- >> >> >>> > Thomas Jungblut >> >> >>> > Berlin >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Thomas Jungblut >> >> >> Berlin <[email protected]> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> >> > @eddieyoon >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thomas Jungblut >> > Berlin <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >> > > > > -- > Thomas Jungblut > Berlin <[email protected]> -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
