> > Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0. > And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top > of Hadoop 1.0. > AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release > just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0.
Yes, this sounds reasonable. 2012/1/31 Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> > +1 > > And as Thomas mentioned that sticking to the stable release looks > safer for us in maintenance. > > On 31 January 2012 11:13, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0. > > > > And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top > > of Hadoop 1.0. > > > > AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release > > just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0. > > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Jungblut > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes. > >> > >> There is > >> - 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0. > >> - 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0 as > well. > >> But we have to test this. > >> - 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may not > run > >> on this as well. > >> - 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work. > >> - 23.0 we have YARN. > >> > >> We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases. > Better > >> would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22. > >> > >> In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release, > which > >> is *0.20.203. * > >> And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases. On > the > >> common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0. > >> > >> 2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> > >> > >>> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps > >>> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2) > >>> would be a bit easier for us. > >>> > >>> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different Hadoop > versions? > >>> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0. > >>> > > >>> > What should we do with yarn? > >>> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people can try it out. > >>> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my work is stable. > >>> > > >>> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>: > >>> >> +1 > >>> >> > >>> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >>> >> > >>> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2 and switch the > trunk > >>> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon < > [email protected]> > >>> >>> wrote: > >>> >>> > Hi all, > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we use hadoop 1.0.0? and > >>> should > >>> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT? > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > -- > >>> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >>> >>> > @eddieyoon > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> -- > >>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >>> >>> @eddieyoon > >>> >>> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Thomas Jungblut > >>> > Berlin > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas Jungblut > >> Berlin <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > @eddieyoon > -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin <[email protected]>
