BTW, should we release yarn with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT? On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Jungblut <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0. >> And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top >> of Hadoop 1.0. >> AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release >> just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0. > > > Yes, this sounds reasonable. > > 2012/1/31 Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> > >> +1 >> >> And as Thomas mentioned that sticking to the stable release looks >> safer for us in maintenance. >> >> On 31 January 2012 11:13, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0. >> > >> > And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top >> > of Hadoop 1.0. >> > >> > AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release >> > just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0. >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Jungblut >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes. >> >> >> >> There is >> >> - 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0. >> >> - 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0 as >> well. >> >> But we have to test this. >> >> - 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may not >> run >> >> on this as well. >> >> - 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work. >> >> - 23.0 we have YARN. >> >> >> >> We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases. >> Better >> >> would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22. >> >> >> >> In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release, >> which >> >> is *0.20.203. * >> >> And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases. On >> the >> >> common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0. >> >> >> >> 2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps >> >>> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2) >> >>> would be a bit easier for us. >> >>> >> >>> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different Hadoop >> versions? >> >>> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0. >> >>> > >> >>> > What should we do with yarn? >> >>> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people can try it out. >> >>> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my work is stable. >> >>> > >> >>> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>: >> >>> >> +1 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2 and switch the >> trunk >> >>> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon < >> [email protected]> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> > Hi all, >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we use hadoop 1.0.0? and >> >>> should >> >>> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT? >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > -- >> >>> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> >>> >>> > @eddieyoon >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> -- >> >>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> >>> >>> @eddieyoon >> >>> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Thomas Jungblut >> >>> > Berlin >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thomas Jungblut >> >> Berlin <[email protected]> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> > @eddieyoon >> > > > > -- > Thomas Jungblut > Berlin <[email protected]>
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
