I've implemented this with short-form attributes (:/ etc.). However, it
looks like it may not be possible to implement :>.
Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
> I just realized I put the wrong method signatures here. I meant
>
> haml_tag(name, *haml_attributes, html_attributes = {}) {...}
> haml_tag(name, text, *haml_attributes, html_attributes = {}) {...}
>
> We could also use less-verbose attribute names, e.g. haml_tag(:p, :>,
> :<) { stuff }. Thoughts?
>
> Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
>> Rymaï's solution would work. The problem with multiple methods is
>> that we probably also want to add support for self-closing tags,
>> which makes for way too many methods. Maybe something like
>>
>> haml_tag(name, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>> haml_tag(name, text, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>
>> So you could call it as haml_tag(:p, :chomp_outer_whitespace) { stuff }.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think its easier if we separate in 3 diferent methods:
>> haml_tag, haml_tag_inside and haml_tag_outside. This can be
>> metaprogrammed easily (I think) and is compatible with older
>> versions.
>>
>>
>> On 2 jun, 15:18, Rymaï <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> > I don't really understand, do you mean that automatically
>> > ":chomp_whitespace => :all" is transformed to
>> > "chomp_whitespace='all'" ?
>> >
>> > In this case, maybe you should add an argument to the #haml_tag
>> > method:
>> >
>> > haml_tag(name, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>> > haml_tag(name, text, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {})
>> {...}
>> >
>> > Just a though...
>> >
>> > On Jun 2, 11:53 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The problem with this is that it makes it impossible to
>> generate <img
>> > > chomp_whitespace='all' /> and the like. While this probably
>> won't come
>> > > up in practice, the inconsistency worries me.
>> >
>> > > Rymaï wrote:
>> > > > Something like:
>> >
>> > > > haml_tag(:blockquote, :chomp_whitespace => :outside) do
>> > > > haml_tag(:p, :chomp_whitespace => :inside) do
>> > > > Foo
>> > > > Bar
>> > > > end
>> > > > haml_tag(:img, :chomp_whitespace => :all)
>> > > > end
>> >
>> > > > Would be cool, though, maybe a more concise way would be
>> better... :)
>> >
>> > > > On Jun 1, 6:25 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > >> Yeah, that would be good. I'd also like some way to create
>> self-closing
>> > > >> tags. I'm not sure what the syntax would be, though... any
>> suggestions?
>> >
>> > > >> Rymaï wrote:
>> >
>> > > >>> Hi,
>> >
>> > > >>> Can we emulate '<' and '>' for #haml_tag method ?
>> >
>> > > >>> Thanks,
>> >
>> > > >>> Rémy.
>> >
>> > > >>> On May 10, 11:18 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > >>>> Hi folks,
>> >
>> > > >>>> The single longest-standing and most egregious lack of
>> functionality in
>> > > >>>> Haml, as detailed
>> inhttp://nex-3.com/posts/75-haml-whitespace-handling-sucks-too
>> <http://nex-3.com/posts/75-haml-whitespace-handling-sucks-too>, has
>> > > >>>> finally been fixed. It's now possible to get Haml *not*
>> to insertwhitespaceeither around or within tags.
>> >
>> > > >>>> The syntax for this is angle brackets, > or <, placed at
>> the end of a
>> > > >>>> tag (after the attributes but before = or / if you have
>> them). You can
>> > > >>>> think of them as alligators, chomping onwhitespace. > is
>> chomping thewhitespaceon the outside:
>> >
>> > > >>>> %blockquote
>> > > >>>> %p>
>> > > >>>> Foo
>> > > >>>> Bar
>> >
>> > > >>>> =>
>> >
>> > > >>>> <blockquote><p>
>> > > >>>> Foo
>> > > >>>> Bar
>> > > >>>> </p></blockquote>
>> >
>> > > >>>> And < is chomping thewhitespaceon the inside:
>> >
>> > > >>>> %blockquote
>> > > >>>> %p<
>> > > >>>> Foo
>> > > >>>> Bar
>> >
>> > > >>>> =>
>> >
>> > > >>>> <blockquote>
>> > > >>>> <p>Foo
>> > > >>>> Bar</p>
>> > > >>>> </blockquote>
>> >
>> > > >>>> These aren't the best examples, because they're not
>> terribly useful. But
>> > > >>>> you can also do stuff like
>> >
>> > > >>>> %img
>> > > >>>> %img>
>> > > >>>> %img
>> >
>> > > >>>> =>
>> >
>> > > >>>> <img /><img /><img />
>> >
>> > > >>>> Or
>> >
>> > > >>>> %pre<
>> > > >>>> :preserve
>> > > >>>> Foo
>> > > >>>> Bar
>> > > >>>> Baz
>> >
>> > > >>>> =>
>> >
>> > > >>>> <pre>Foo
 Bar
 Baz
</pre>
>> >
>> > > >>>> You can use this right now by getting Haml from
>> > > >>>> git://github.com/nex3/haml.git
>> <http://github.com/nex3/haml.git> and running "rake install" to
>> install it
>> > > >>>> as a gem.
>> >
>> > > >>>> Many thanks to everyone who helped out with brainstorming
>> how this
>> > > >>>> feature should work, including Evgeny Zislis and Sunny
>> Ripert on my
>> > > >>>> blog, Nathan Sutton and Dustin Sallings on #haml on
>> freenode, and many
>> > > >>>> people in various conversations on this mailing list.
>> >
>> > > >>>> - Nathan
>> >>
>>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
