The short-form syntax looks much nicer! What is the problem with :>?
Irb seems to be okay with it:
>> :>.to_s
=> ">"
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've implemented this with short-form attributes (:/ etc.). However, it
> looks like it may not be possible to implement :>.
>
> Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
>> I just realized I put the wrong method signatures here. I meant
>>
>> haml_tag(name, *haml_attributes, html_attributes = {}) {...}
>> haml_tag(name, text, *haml_attributes, html_attributes = {}) {...}
>>
>> We could also use less-verbose attribute names, e.g. haml_tag(:p, :>,
>> :<) { stuff }. Thoughts?
>>
>> Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
>>> Rymaï's solution would work. The problem with multiple methods is
>>> that we probably also want to add support for self-closing tags,
>>> which makes for way too many methods. Maybe something like
>>>
>>> haml_tag(name, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>> haml_tag(name, text, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>
>>> So you could call it as haml_tag(:p, :chomp_outer_whitespace) { stuff }.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I think its easier if we separate in 3 diferent methods:
>>> haml_tag, haml_tag_inside and haml_tag_outside. This can be
>>> metaprogrammed easily (I think) and is compatible with older
>>> versions.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2 jun, 15:18, Rymaï <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> > I don't really understand, do you mean that automatically
>>> > ":chomp_whitespace => :all" is transformed to
>>> > "chomp_whitespace='all'" ?
>>> >
>>> > In this case, maybe you should add an argument to the #haml_tag
>>> > method:
>>> >
>>> > haml_tag(name, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>> > haml_tag(name, text, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {})
>>> {...}
>>> >
>>> > Just a though...
>>> >
>>> > On Jun 2, 11:53 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > The problem with this is that it makes it impossible to
>>> generate <img
>>> > > chomp_whitespace='all' /> and the like. While this probably
>>> won't come
>>> > > up in practice, the inconsistency worries me.
>>> >
>>> > > Rymaï wrote:
>>> > > > Something like:
>>> >
>>> > > > haml_tag(:blockquote, :chomp_whitespace => :outside) do
>>> > > > haml_tag(:p, :chomp_whitespace => :inside) do
>>> > > > Foo
>>> > > > Bar
>>> > > > end
>>> > > > haml_tag(:img, :chomp_whitespace => :all)
>>> > > > end
>>> >
>>> > > > Would be cool, though, maybe a more concise way would be
>>> better... :)
>>> >
>>> > > > On Jun 1, 6:25 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > >> Yeah, that would be good. I'd also like some way to create
>>> self-closing
>>> > > >> tags. I'm not sure what the syntax would be, though... any
>>> suggestions?
>>> >
>>> > > >> Rymaï wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > >>> Hi,
>>> >
>>> > > >>> Can we emulate '<' and '>' for #haml_tag method ?
>>> >
>>> > > >>> Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > > >>> Rémy.
>>> >
>>> > > >>> On May 10, 11:18 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> Hi folks,
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> The single longest-standing and most egregious lack of
>>> functionality in
>>> > > >>>> Haml, as detailed
>>> inhttp://nex-3.com/posts/75-haml-whitespace-handling-sucks-too
>>> <http://nex-3.com/posts/75-haml-whitespace-handling-sucks-too>, has
>>> > > >>>> finally been fixed. It's now possible to get Haml *not*
>>> to insertwhitespaceeither around or within tags.
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> The syntax for this is angle brackets, > or <, placed at
>>> the end of a
>>> > > >>>> tag (after the attributes but before = or / if you have
>>> them). You can
>>> > > >>>> think of them as alligators, chomping onwhitespace. > is
>>> chomping thewhitespaceon the outside:
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> %blockquote
>>> > > >>>> %p>
>>> > > >>>> Foo
>>> > > >>>> Bar
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> =>
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> <blockquote><p>
>>> > > >>>> Foo
>>> > > >>>> Bar
>>> > > >>>> </p></blockquote>
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> And < is chomping thewhitespaceon the inside:
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> %blockquote
>>> > > >>>> %p<
>>> > > >>>> Foo
>>> > > >>>> Bar
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> =>
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> <blockquote>
>>> > > >>>> <p>Foo
>>> > > >>>> Bar</p>
>>> > > >>>> </blockquote>
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> These aren't the best examples, because they're not
>>> terribly useful. But
>>> > > >>>> you can also do stuff like
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> %img
>>> > > >>>> %img>
>>> > > >>>> %img
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> =>
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> <img /><img /><img />
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> Or
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> %pre<
>>> > > >>>> :preserve
>>> > > >>>> Foo
>>> > > >>>> Bar
>>> > > >>>> Baz
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> =>
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> <pre>Foo
 Bar
 Baz
</pre>
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> You can use this right now by getting Haml from
>>> > > >>>> git://github.com/nex3/haml.git
>>> <http://github.com/nex3/haml.git> and running "rake install" to
>>> install it
>>> > > >>>> as a gem.
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> Many thanks to everyone who helped out with brainstorming
>>> how this
>>> > > >>>> feature should work, including Evgeny Zislis and Sunny
>>> Ripert on my
>>> > > >>>> blog, Nathan Sutton and Dustin Sallings on #haml on
>>> freenode, and many
>>> > > >>>> people in various conversations on this mailing list.
>>> >
>>> > > >>>> - Nathan
>>> >>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
