Oh, right, I didn't think about that. Thanks for the explanation.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem isn't the symbol itself, it's the implementation of the
> outer-whitespace-chomping behavior. There's not really a way to do it
> without having access to the compilation context.
>
> Miha Filej wrote:
>> The short-form syntax looks much nicer! What is the problem with :>?
>>
>> Irb seems to be okay with it:
>>
>>>> :>.to_s
>>>>
>> => ">"
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've implemented this with short-form attributes (:/ etc.). However, it
>>> looks like it may not be possible to implement :>.
>>>
>>> Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just realized I put the wrong method signatures here. I meant
>>>>
>>>> haml_tag(name, *haml_attributes, html_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>> haml_tag(name, text, *haml_attributes, html_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>>
>>>> We could also use less-verbose attribute names, e.g. haml_tag(:p, :>,
>>>> :<) { stuff }. Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rymaï's solution would work. The problem with multiple methods is
>>>>> that we probably also want to add support for self-closing tags,
>>>>> which makes for way too many methods. Maybe something like
>>>>>
>>>>> haml_tag(name, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>>> haml_tag(name, text, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>>>
>>>>> So you could call it as haml_tag(:p, :chomp_outer_whitespace) { stuff }.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think its easier if we separate in 3 diferent methods:
>>>>> haml_tag, haml_tag_inside and haml_tag_outside. This can be
>>>>> metaprogrammed easily (I think) and is compatible with older
>>>>> versions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2 jun, 15:18, Rymaï <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>> > I don't really understand, do you mean that automatically
>>>>> > ":chomp_whitespace => :all" is transformed to
>>>>> > "chomp_whitespace='all'" ?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > In this case, maybe you should add an argument to the #haml_tag
>>>>> > method:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > haml_tag(name, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>>> > haml_tag(name, text, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {})
>>>>> {...}
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Just a though...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Jun 2, 11:53 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > The problem with this is that it makes it impossible to
>>>>> generate <img
>>>>> > > chomp_whitespace='all' /> and the like. While this probably
>>>>> won't come
>>>>> > > up in practice, the inconsistency worries me.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Rymaï wrote:
>>>>> > > > Something like:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > haml_tag(:blockquote, :chomp_whitespace => :outside) do
>>>>> > > > haml_tag(:p, :chomp_whitespace => :inside) do
>>>>> > > > Foo
>>>>> > > > Bar
>>>>> > > > end
>>>>> > > > haml_tag(:img, :chomp_whitespace => :all)
>>>>> > > > end
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > Would be cool, though, maybe a more concise way would be
>>>>> better... :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > On Jun 1, 6:25 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >> Yeah, that would be good. I'd also like some way to create
>>>>> self-closing
>>>>> > > >> tags. I'm not sure what the syntax would be, though... any
>>>>> suggestions?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >> Rymaï wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>> Hi,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>> Can we emulate '<' and '>' for #haml_tag method ?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>> Thanks,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>> Rémy.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>> On May 10, 11:18 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> Hi folks,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> The single longest-standing and most egregious lack of
>>>>> functionality in
>>>>> > > >>>> Haml, as detailed
>>>>> inhttp://nex-3.com/posts/75-haml-whitespace-handling-sucks-too
>>>>> <http://nex-3.com/posts/75-haml-whitespace-handling-sucks-too>, has
>>>>> > > >>>> finally been fixed. It's now possible to get Haml *not*
>>>>> to insertwhitespaceeither around or within tags.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> The syntax for this is angle brackets, > or <, placed at
>>>>> the end of a
>>>>> > > >>>> tag (after the attributes but before = or / if you have
>>>>> them). You can
>>>>> > > >>>> think of them as alligators, chomping onwhitespace. > is
>>>>> chomping thewhitespaceon the outside:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> %blockquote
>>>>> > > >>>> %p>
>>>>> > > >>>> Foo
>>>>> > > >>>> Bar
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> =>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> <blockquote><p>
>>>>> > > >>>> Foo
>>>>> > > >>>> Bar
>>>>> > > >>>> </p></blockquote>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> And < is chomping thewhitespaceon the inside:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> %blockquote
>>>>> > > >>>> %p<
>>>>> > > >>>> Foo
>>>>> > > >>>> Bar
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> =>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> <blockquote>
>>>>> > > >>>> <p>Foo
>>>>> > > >>>> Bar</p>
>>>>> > > >>>> </blockquote>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> These aren't the best examples, because they're not
>>>>> terribly useful. But
>>>>> > > >>>> you can also do stuff like
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> %img
>>>>> > > >>>> %img>
>>>>> > > >>>> %img
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> =>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> <img /><img /><img />
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> Or
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> %pre<
>>>>> > > >>>> :preserve
>>>>> > > >>>> Foo
>>>>> > > >>>> Bar
>>>>> > > >>>> Baz
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> =>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> <pre>Foo
 Bar
 Baz
</pre>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> You can use this right now by getting Haml from
>>>>> > > >>>> git://github.com/nex3/haml.git
>>>>> <http://github.com/nex3/haml.git> and running "rake install" to
>>>>> install it
>>>>> > > >>>> as a gem.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> Many thanks to everyone who helped out with brainstorming
>>>>> how this
>>>>> > > >>>> feature should work, including Evgeny Zislis and Sunny
>>>>> Ripert on my
>>>>> > > >>>> blog, Nathan Sutton and Dustin Sallings on #haml on
>>>>> freenode, and many
>>>>> > > >>>> people in various conversations on this mailing list.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>> - Nathan
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
