The problem isn't the symbol itself, it's the implementation of the 
outer-whitespace-chomping behavior. There's not really a way to do it 
without having access to the compilation context.

Miha Filej wrote:
> The short-form syntax looks much nicer! What is the problem with :>?
>
> Irb seems to be okay with it:
>   
>>> :>.to_s
>>>       
> => ">"
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> I've implemented this with short-form attributes (:/ etc.). However, it
>> looks like it may not be possible to implement :>.
>>
>> Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
>>     
>>> I just realized I put the wrong method signatures here. I meant
>>>
>>> haml_tag(name, *haml_attributes, html_attributes = {}) {...}
>>> haml_tag(name, text, *haml_attributes, html_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>
>>> We could also use less-verbose attribute names, e.g. haml_tag(:p, :>,
>>> :<) { stuff }. Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Rymaï's solution would work. The problem with multiple methods is
>>>> that we probably also want to add support for self-closing tags,
>>>> which makes for way too many methods. Maybe something like
>>>>
>>>> haml_tag(name, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>> haml_tag(name, text, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>>
>>>> So you could call it as haml_tag(:p, :chomp_outer_whitespace) { stuff }.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     I think its easier if we separate in 3 diferent methods:
>>>>     haml_tag, haml_tag_inside and haml_tag_outside. This can be
>>>>     metaprogrammed easily (I think) and is compatible with older
>>>> versions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 2 jun, 15:18, Rymaï <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>     > I don't really understand, do you mean that automatically
>>>>     > ":chomp_whitespace => :all" is transformed to
>>>>     > "chomp_whitespace='all'" ?
>>>>     >
>>>>     > In this case, maybe you should add an argument to the #haml_tag
>>>>     > method:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > haml_tag(name, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {}) {...}
>>>>     > haml_tag(name, text, html_attributes = {}, haml_attributes = {})
>>>>     {...}
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Just a though...
>>>>     >
>>>>     > On Jun 2, 11:53 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > The problem with this is that it makes it impossible to
>>>>     generate <img
>>>>     > > chomp_whitespace='all' /> and the like. While this probably
>>>>     won't come
>>>>     > > up in practice, the inconsistency worries me.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > Rymaï wrote:
>>>>     > > > Something like:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > > haml_tag(:blockquote, :chomp_whitespace => :outside) do
>>>>     > > >   haml_tag(:p, :chomp_whitespace => :inside) do
>>>>     > > >     Foo
>>>>     > > >     Bar
>>>>     > > >   end
>>>>     > > >   haml_tag(:img, :chomp_whitespace => :all)
>>>>     > > > end
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > > Would be cool, though, maybe a more concise way would be
>>>>     better... :)
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > > On Jun 1, 6:25 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >> Yeah, that would be good. I'd also like some way to create
>>>>     self-closing
>>>>     > > >> tags. I'm not sure what the syntax would be, though... any
>>>>     suggestions?
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >> Rymaï wrote:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>> Hi,
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>> Can we emulate '<' and '>' for #haml_tag method ?
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>> Thanks,
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>> Rémy.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>> On May 10, 11:18 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> Hi folks,
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> The single longest-standing and most egregious lack of
>>>>     functionality in
>>>>     > > >>>> Haml, as detailed
>>>>     inhttp://nex-3.com/posts/75-haml-whitespace-handling-sucks-too
>>>>     <http://nex-3.com/posts/75-haml-whitespace-handling-sucks-too>, has
>>>>     > > >>>> finally been fixed. It's now possible to get Haml *not*
>>>>     to insertwhitespaceeither around or within tags.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> The syntax for this is angle brackets, > or <, placed at
>>>>     the end of a
>>>>     > > >>>> tag (after the attributes but before = or / if you have
>>>>     them). You can
>>>>     > > >>>> think of them as alligators, chomping onwhitespace. > is
>>>>     chomping thewhitespaceon the outside:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>>   %blockquote
>>>>     > > >>>>     %p>
>>>>     > > >>>>       Foo
>>>>     > > >>>>       Bar
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> =>
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>>   <blockquote><p>
>>>>     > > >>>>       Foo
>>>>     > > >>>>       Bar
>>>>     > > >>>>     </p></blockquote>
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> And < is chomping thewhitespaceon the inside:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>>   %blockquote
>>>>     > > >>>>     %p<
>>>>     > > >>>>       Foo
>>>>     > > >>>>       Bar
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> =>
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>>   <blockquote>
>>>>     > > >>>>     <p>Foo
>>>>     > > >>>>     Bar</p>
>>>>     > > >>>>   </blockquote>
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> These aren't the best examples, because they're not
>>>>     terribly useful. But
>>>>     > > >>>> you can also do stuff like
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>>   %img
>>>>     > > >>>>   %img>
>>>>     > > >>>>   %img
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> =>
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>>   <img /><img /><img />
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> Or
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>>   %pre<
>>>>     > > >>>>     :preserve
>>>>     > > >>>>       Foo
>>>>     > > >>>>        Bar
>>>>     > > >>>>         Baz
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> =>
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>>   <pre>Foo&#x000A; Bar&#x000A;  Baz&#x000A;</pre>
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> You can use this right now by getting Haml from
>>>>     > > >>>> git://github.com/nex3/haml.git
>>>>     <http://github.com/nex3/haml.git> and running "rake install" to
>>>>     install it
>>>>     > > >>>> as a gem.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> Many thanks to everyone who helped out with brainstorming
>>>>     how this
>>>>     > > >>>> feature should work, including Evgeny Zislis and Sunny
>>>>     Ripert on my
>>>>     > > >>>> blog, Nathan Sutton and Dustin Sallings on #haml on
>>>>     freenode, and many
>>>>     > > >>>> people in various conversations on this mailing list.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > > >>>> - Nathan
>>>>     >>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>>     
>
> >
>   


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to