On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Jean Christophe Andr?
<jean-christophe.andre at auf.org> wrote:
> Yep, I fully agree that being NAT'ed, which means not getting even one
> single public/routable IP address, is totally unacceptable and is a very
> good reason to change ISP ! Still I think it's not the case with your
> FTP link here.
It happened to me when I was in Japan and the provider is Yahoo Japan.
FPT (not ftp) is the first experience of mine in Vietnam.
Of course, I have to admit that you have much better understanding of
ISP in Vietnam than me :) (ask Mr Quynh, he will tell you why)
>> Another observation (complaint?) is that: 4 months ago, when I first hooked
>> up this
>>MegaSlow service, the speed ( especially toward Internet outbound), was kinda
>>good[1],
>> but recently speed has become much slower[2]...
>>
> I can't tell about this, but remember there is a contractual maximum
> warranted speed...
Yes, but is conditional (see below)
>Also, from my experience a few years ago, in work
> hours I was only able to get 300 kbit/s per TCP connexion, but was still
> able to get up to the maximum ADSL speed while multiplying TCP
> connexions (eg using a download accelerator).
I hate this. My work and my hobbies require that I have to ssh to some remote
servers in Japan. Slow connection make it lags and it really slows me because
I am a fast typist..
> But I didn't try recently
> since I had to change ISP when I moved to my current house (I have to
> suffer an ISP monopoly over the building, grrr)...
As someone has pointed out in the past: Viettel has 2.9GBps wire
connecting directly to NTT (a provider in Japan) so my next try will be Viettel.
Em ?? k? h?p ??ng MegaSlow 12 th?ng nh?ng m?i ch? d?ng 4 th?ng.
N?u b?y gi? stop th? b? ph?t bao nhi?u c?c b?c nh??
--
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguy?n V? H?ng )
vuhung16plus{[email protected] , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg
A brief profile: http://www.hn.is.uec.ac.jp/~vuhung/Nguyen.Vu.Hung.html
