while trying to enable "gdb bt" on cirrus-ci, I noticed that we have
similar crashes on musl (where gdb implemented already)

https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/2274

ср, 30 авг. 2023 г. в 05:29, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>:

> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 11:16:32PM +0200, ???? ??????? wrote:
> > ??, 29 ???. 2023 ?. ? 16:45, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 04:31:31PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:16:55PM +0000, Stephan, Alexander wrote:
> > > > > However, I noticed there is a problem now with the FreeBSD test.
> Have
> > > you
> > > > > already looked into it?
> > > >
> > > > Ah no, I had not noticed. I first pushed into a temporary branch and
> > > > everything was OK so I pushed into master again without checking
> since
> > > > it was the exact same commit.
> > > >
> > > > > I was not able to reproduce it for now. Looks like the test passes
> but
> > > it
> > > > > crashes afterwards? Maybe some SEGFAULT. Not sure... the CI on your
> > > branch
> > > > > looked good iirc.
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm no, signal 4 is SIGILL, we're using it for our asserts
> (BUG_ON()).
> > > > I never know how to retrieve the stderr log from these tests, there
> are
> > > > too many layers for me, I've been explained several times but cannot
> > > > memorize it.
> > > >
> > > > I'm rebuilding here on a freebsd machine, hoping to see it happen
> again.
> > > >
> > > > Note that we cannot rule out a transient issue such as a temporary
> memory
> > > > shortage or too long a CPU pause as such VMs are usually overloaded.
> > > > Maybe it has nothing to do with your new test but just randomly
> triggered
> > > > there, or maybe it put the light on a corner case. At least it's not
> a
> > > > segfault or such a crash that would indicate a pointer misuse.
> > >
> > > I'm getting totally random results from vtest on FreeBSD, I don't know
> > > why. I even tried to limit to one parallel process and am still getting
> > > on average 2 errors per run, most always on SSL but not only. Some of
> > > them include connection failures (sC) with 503 being returned and
> showing
> > > "Timeout during SSL handshake". I'm not getting the SIGILL though. Thus
> > > I don't know what to think about it, especially since it previously
> worked.
> > > We'll see if it happens again on next push.
> > >
> > > Willy
> > >
> >
> > we can disable cirrus-ci, not sure what is the purpose of randomly
> failing
> > CI :)
>
> I think it's still used for arm builds or something like this. Regardless,
> given that freebsd randomly fails on my local platform,there might be
> something else. I remember that cirrus used to fail some time ago, I
> don't know what its status is right now.
>
> Willy
>

Reply via email to