Well on that point, conroe tests show that even with the current
non-integrated controller from the 975X, the CPU's memory performance as a
whole does as good or better than an A64 X2. I think this test shows that
latency is now a major factor for conroe - just like it always has been for
AMD. Interesting to note that DDR2-533 has a *slight* performance lead over
DDR2-667.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], The Hardware List
<[email protected]>
To: "The Hardware List" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [H] Anandtech test shows DDR2 is a crock,DDR-400 just as fast
for Conroe.
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:21:50 +0000
I don't know why this would suprise anyone. With a non-integrated memory
controller, I struggle to see how you'd ever get that big of a performance
jump with ddr2
CW
Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
-----Original Message-----
From: "Hayes Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:48:28
To:[email protected]
Subject: [H] Anandtech test shows DDR2 is a crock,
DDR-400 just as fast for Conroe.
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2810
