fp
At 09:03 AM 8/8/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poked the stick with:
What conroa is is super efficient and it lives up to all the hype. At the same time I can't figure out impact on the channel
Someone had asked about x2 5000+ availability.... Try to find me conroe chips almost anywhere :). Tier1 manufacturers only babe :)
Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
-----Original Message-----
From: "Hayes Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:47:12
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [H] Anandtech test shows DDR2 is a crock,
DDR-400 just as fast for Conroe.
Well on that point, conroe tests show that even with the current
non-integrated controller from the 975X, the CPU's memory performance as a
whole does as good or better than an A64 X2. I think this test shows that
latency is now a major factor for conroe - just like it always has been for
AMD. Interesting to note that DDR2-533 has a *slight* performance lead over
DDR2-667.
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], The Hardware List
><[email protected]>
>To: "The Hardware List" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [H] Anandtech test shows DDR2 is a crock,DDR-400 just as fast
>for Conroe.
>Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:21:50 +0000
>
>I don't know why this would suprise anyone. With a non-integrated memory
>controller, I struggle to see how you'd ever get that big of a performance
>jump with ddr2
>
>CW
>Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Hayes Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:48:28
>To:[email protected]
>Subject: [H] Anandtech test shows DDR2 is a crock,
>DDR-400 just as fast for Conroe.
>
> http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2810
>
>
>
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Everything's got a moral, if only you can find it.
