Well then here, use the Coral IE Tab extension instead:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addons/policy/0/10909/63722?src=addondetail

It's like IE tab except you can force certain URLs/bookmarks to always open
in an IE tab instead of Firefox, and it works with AdBLock Plus and syncs
cookies between FF and IE.

---------------------------
Brian Weeden
Technical Advisor
Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundation.org>
Montreal Office
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US


On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Christopher Fisk <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Brian Weeden wrote:
>
>  Why not just use the IE Tab extension and toggle the page over to the IE
>> renderer when you need to?
>>
>
> May as well use IE at that point.  Training.  If you need to train a user
> to use a different program for a certain internal site, then you're spending
> $$$ (even 15 minutes of training for 100 users is 25 man hours assuming the
> training is perfect)
>
>  Or is there something about certain Active X plugins not working with it?
>>
>> Seriously, Active X was one of the WORST design choices Microsoft has ever
>> made from a security standpoint.  SO many of the security holes in IE (and
>> thus Windows) come from Active X it's not even funny.  Which again makes
>> me
>> laugh that companies insist that they must use IE for Active X and that
>> they
>> can't use Firefox because it can't be secured :)
>>
>
> I agree.  ActiveX needs to die a quick death.  The problem is that big
> companies spend millions on internal websites.  If it has been written with
> IE as the supported base with internal ActiveX programs, good luck getting
> anyone to agree to a re-write.  Plus, who actually knows if the person who
> wrote/designed that ActiveX control is even with the company anymore?
>
> For a company, Firefox is not free.
>
>
> Christopher Fisk
> --
> Zoidberg: Muy macho. Hey, gringos, here comes El Zoido to ruin your
> drinking water!
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>

Reply via email to