The pixel density at such size screens are so dense that you may not really notice any difference between 720 and 1080.
For bigger flat screens 1080 is noticeable (ie bluray) -----Original Message----- From: Steve Tomporowski <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:00:06 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [H] advise Okay, only from a quick survey at Walmart and Best Buy. All of their sets under 37" are 720p. Which I thought was very weird as computer flat panels have been higher than that in those sizes for years.... Thanks for the link. Steve Naushad, Zulfiqar wrote: > Where did you hear that all TV's below 37 inches are only 720? > > > Check this out. > > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2102640411+1 > 38902005+138982080&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Configur > ator=&Subcategory=411&description=&Ntk=&CFG=&SpeTabStoreType=&srchInDesc > = > > 32 inches and 1080p. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve > Tomporowski > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 4:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [H] advise > > Since we're on this subject....All TV's below 37" are 720. What does > one of those TV's do when fed with a 1080 signal? Or does it just not > display? I've wondered about that since I would think that with the > mixtures of 1080/720 stations, they'd want everything to display > everything....or am I mistake because that makes sense? > > Steve > > Greg Sevart wrote: >>> Scientifically, it's hard to understand why this happened because >>> CRT, LCoS and DLP offered the highest picture quality at the lowest >>> price, while direct-view large-screen LCDs have historically offered >>> the lowest picture quality at the highest price. This seems to be the >> I disagree completely with this statement from the analysis. >> Projection-based technologies have had two advantages: they're cheap > and >> available in very large sizes. They haven't ever really been > competitive in >> terms of image quality with anything other than bottom-feeder LCD and > plasma >> sets. >> >> Personally, I'm a big fan of Samsung's current lineup of LCD sets. I > don't >> really like their marketing though...for example, the new sets are NOT > LED >> TVs. They're LED-backlit LCDs. It's a major step forward in technology > to be >> sure, but it is still an LCD panel with the only change being from a > CCFL to >> LED backlight. AFAIK, the only places you'll find real LED TVs are the > huge >> jumbotrons at sporting venues. >> >> I should also mention that several people that have seen my 52" > Samsung >> Series 7 (LN52A750-now 1 year old) have went out and bought one > themselves >> based on nothing other than the spectacular image quality. Sony's best > sets >> are very comparable as well--you can't really go wrong with either of > them >> at this point. >> >> Plasma has always felt more like an interim technology to me, and the > sales >> volume supports that. There are still a few things they do better than > LCDs, >> but the current generation of LCDs have gotten so good that plasma > really >> only becomes compelling when looking for a set bigger than the 52-55" > that >> mainstream LCDs seem to top out at. >> >> Just my two cents. Opinions on this topic tend to be quite....strong. >> >> Greg >> >> >> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4461 (20090927) __________ >> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4461 (20090927) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 4461 (20090927) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4462 (20090927) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
