Anandtech has an excellent article with info directly from an Intel VP on
the source of the problem:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4143/the-source-of-intels-cougar-point-sata-bug

Note that it only affects certain SATA channels.

-----------
Brian
Follow Me [image: LinkedIn] <http://www.linkedin.com/in/brianweeden> [image:
Twitter] <http://www.twitter.com/brianweeden>


On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Stan Zaske <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not involved in this sticky situation but if it were me and the
> manufacturer was footing the bill for the chipset recall I'd take advantage
> of it just to be safe. You know ASUS and the others will just de-solder
> those chips and sell those motherboards as re-manufactured. It must really
> sting Intel knowing how much lost revenue the board makers are going to
> suffer. Unless Intel compensates them somehow with that Billion $'s they've
> set aside. I'm not too fond of Intel as many of you are well aware but
> kudo's to them for manning up so quickly to deal with the problem.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:13:07 -0600, FORC5 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  have all the parts for a H67 system and wondering what to do, only thing
>> will be on the 3gbs ports is a DVD burner.
>> If I can find some time I need to go over these article b4 I make any
>> hasty decisions.
>> Will probably wait a little ( do to other pressing matters). I wonder IF
>> there will be a recall. Do computer company's do recalls ?
>>
>> fp
>>
>> At 05:13 PM 1/31/2011, Anthony Q. Martin Poked the stick with:
>>
>>> Well, it now occurs to me that some of us are lucky.  We still have 4
>>> usable sata ports, 2 usable e-sata ports, 3 usable usb ports and we can get
>>> overclocks to 4.6+ GHz now.  The Egg has taken all their x67 off the market.
>>>
>>> I just realized that I own an Asus u3s6, which gives me another 2 usb 3.0
>>> ports and 2 more 6 GB sata ports.
>>>
>>> LOL on, Bryan, but I ain't cryin! :)
>>>
>>> On 1/31/2011 5:46 PM, DSinc wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bryan,
>>>> If that is your best puerile shot, so be it. Laughing at others unknown
>>>> misfortune does very little good for the thread. But, as always, I consider
>>>> the source!!! LOL!
>>>> Best,
>>>> Duncan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/31/2011 16:56, Bryan Seitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I lol @ the early adopters :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:31:22AM -0600, Greg Sevart wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From what I can tell, yes, all series 6 chipsets are affected.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:28 AM
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [H] Intel hit with chipset design flaw in Sandy Bridge
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> rollout
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The processor is fine--the issue is in the chipset. They are -all-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> impacted;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> new silicon will not be available until February. It also appears to
>>>>>>>> be a longevity related problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So both the P67 and the H67?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>> signature database 5835 (20110131) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>

Reply via email to