Given how mind-blowingly complex this stuff is and how fast the innovation rate is, I'm impressed by how few issues like this there are.
----------- Brian On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Stan Zaske <[email protected]> wrote: > This is true and I'll be taking a chance in the weeks to come when the new > AMD chipset boards come out and later again when the first Bulldozer chips > come out. I'm very conservative usually but I've been waiting years for AMD > to bring some radical changes to market and I intend to jump on board soon > after. :) > > > > On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:13:00 -0600, Anthony Q. Martin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Someone has to be the early adopters for every tech. >> >> On 1/31/2011 11:49 PM, Stan Zaske wrote: >> >>> Yeah, no matter how many times we warn ourselves over the years the >>> impatience to hop on board the latest and greatest bandwagon often proves to >>> be irresistible. Ask me about my experience with AMD's new Bulldozer >>> architecture in May or June. LOL >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:56:29 -0600, Bryan Seitz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I lol @ the early adopters :) >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:31:22AM -0600, Greg Sevart wrote: >>>> >>>>> >From what I can tell, yes, all series 6 chipsets are affected. >>>>> >>>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>>> > From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware- >>>>> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary >>>>> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:28 AM >>>>> > To: [email protected] >>>>> > Subject: Re: [H] Intel hit with chipset design flaw in Sandy Bridge >>>>> rollout >>>>> > >>>>> > > The processor is fine--the issue is in the chipset. They are -all- >>>>> > impacted; >>>>> > > new silicon will not be available until February. It also appears >>>>> to >>>>> > > be a longevity related problem. >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> > So both the P67 and the H67? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >
