True that!
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:22:31 -0600, Brian Weeden <[email protected]>
wrote:
Given how mind-blowingly complex this stuff is and how fast the
innovation
rate is, I'm impressed by how few issues like this there are.
-----------
Brian
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Stan Zaske <[email protected]> wrote:
This is true and I'll be taking a chance in the weeks to come when the
new
AMD chipset boards come out and later again when the first Bulldozer
chips
come out. I'm very conservative usually but I've been waiting years for
AMD
to bring some radical changes to market and I intend to jump on board
soon
after. :)
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:13:00 -0600, Anthony Q. Martin
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Someone has to be the early adopters for every tech.
On 1/31/2011 11:49 PM, Stan Zaske wrote:
Yeah, no matter how many times we warn ourselves over the years the
impatience to hop on board the latest and greatest bandwagon often
proves to
be irresistible. Ask me about my experience with AMD's new Bulldozer
architecture in May or June. LOL
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:56:29 -0600, Bryan Seitz <[email protected]>
wrote:
I lol @ the early adopters :)
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:31:22AM -0600, Greg Sevart wrote:
>From what I can tell, yes, all series 6 chipsets are affected.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:28 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [H] Intel hit with chipset design flaw in Sandy
Bridge
rollout
>
> > The processor is fine--the issue is in the chipset. They are
-all-
> impacted;
> > new silicon will not be available until February. It also
appears
to
> > be a longevity related problem.
> >
>
> So both the P67 and the H67?
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
