On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <allb...@ece.cmu.edu> wrote: > On 2009 Feb 25, at 5:23, John Lato wrote: >> >> Brandon Allbery wrote: >>> >>> I have to second this; I'm a Unix sysadmin, 98% of the time if I'm >>> writing a program it's for Unix *and* requires POSIX APIxs, and even >>> if it could apply to Windows the program needed there would be very >>> significantly different. And we have a Windows group for that. >> >> 2. As of now, the "Windows Group" seems to be mostly Duncan. And > > Wrong Windows group: Duncan doesn't work for us. >
Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you meant a Windows group within the Haskell community, not within your company. Honestly, what I wrote wasn't directed at you. As I mentioned before, writing code as a Unix sysadmin has very different priorities than writing for many other problem domains. Most of your code wouldn't make sense outside a Unix context, whereas bytestrings, tries, or graph libraries would. Cheers, John Lato _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe